30%
FLAT OFF

On every SSB software product

Flat 30% discount on any software

School, hospital, hotel, restaurant, HR, lab, pharma and the rest of our software. Ask for a quote and we apply 30% on the price. Write to info@ssbconsultancy.com.

Software

An AI demo that nobody trusts on Monday

AI is useful when it drafts, sorts or finds something your team already stores. It is a liability when it is asked to invent a price, a diagnosis or a promise you will be held to.

Setup
A pilot on one workflow
Who it is for
Teams with a repeated text or sorting job
Industry
Software
Product
AI solutions

The problem on the ground

The demo is fed friendly questions and answers well. On Monday a customer asks about a policy that changed last month. The tool answers from an old PDF, confidently. Staff stop using it, or worse, they do not notice.

We start from the task: sort these requests, draft this reply, find this clause. The documents are the ones you trust. A human remains on the output until you have seen the failures.

We will not put AI on a medical decision, a fee waiver or a legal promise and call it automation. Those stay with the person accountable for them.

See the product

What changes when this is live

One job
Pilot

A repeated task, with a person still checking the result

Your files
The source

Answers come from documents you name, not from the open internet

A reject
When unsure

The tool can say it does not know

A person
Still responsible

Nothing customer-facing goes out unchecked at the start

What keeps breaking

The pilot is judged on a demo script instead of last month’s real requests.

The tool answers from stale or unapproved documents.

It cannot admit uncertainty, so every answer looks final.

Staff have no way to correct it, so the same mistake repeats.

A customer-facing promise is sent without a person reading it.

How the software closes it

The pilot uses a pile of real requests you choose, including the awkward ones.

The source set is an explicit list. If it is not on the list, it is not an answer.

Low confidence is shown as “ask a person”, not as a fluent guess.

A correction is kept so the next draft can be checked against it.

Customer-facing use waits until you have accepted the error rate on the pilot.

How a setup actually runs

Week 1

The repeated job

What a person does today, how long it takes, and what a wrong answer costs.

Next

The documents

Only approved sources. Old files are excluded on purpose.

Pilot

Your real pile

You compare drafts with what your staff would have written.

After

Where it is allowed

Internal first. Customer-facing only if you still want it after the pilot.

Questions this industry asks

Can the AI reply to customers on its own?

Not at the start. The first use is a draft a person sends. Unattended replies are a later decision, after you have seen the mistakes on your own questions.

Will you train a model on our data?

Often we do not need to. Many jobs are search plus a draft over documents you already have. If training is actually required, it is a separate scope with a statement of what data is used.

Is this the same as adding a chatbot to the website?

A chatbot is one possible surface. If it has no approved source, we will not install one. A widget that invents answers is worse than a contact form.

What should we send before a call?

Twenty real examples of the task, and the document a good staff member would have used. If those do not exist, the task is not ready for AI.

Want this flow on a call?

Tell us the operation that is breaking. We will walk that screen and send a written quote.

Chat with Us

We reply instantly

+91

Your message will be sent directly to our WhatsApp